|
|
the_theory_of_everything
|
|
|
kx21
|
***The THEORY of EVERYTHING*** When I, my Master was contemplating the inconceivability of the UNIVERSE, U:- I discovered that The More I know about U, the more inconceivability is in U. Thus I created a unique SPACE, especially for U, the_theory_of_everything, to expose the Beauty of U; and to keep U wandering in my MIND... Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010112
|
|
... |
|
|
rollins
|
i found out everything about her first she fucks, then she fucks over. the first part is the most interesting. the second is the most lasting.
|
010112
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
*The STARS or SHITs* Because of your inconceivability, U have attracted or produced more than 200 Stars or Shits, from Nothing to Everything, SATAN to GOD, HELL to HEAVEN; as at 13 January 2001 in the e_blather SPACE:- blather of universe as at 13 January 2001:- 1980's 42 7 abstract absurdity allegory alma alpha_omegae angel anti_grain antichrist anything ask_god ask_lovers_lament ask_schleiffen_man ask_silentbob beat because before black_hole blather canada censorship chance change change_is_the_only_constant_in_the_universe chat chatroom circle clueless cohesive complete connections cooking_with_brak copyright cosmology cow_skull_filled_with_lead_and_bloody_potato_chip_ cullen damn darkness david_byrne death debris defenestration dervishes descent dichotomy dogma door dreams ducttape eap earth_air_fire_water elsewhere ending enlightened ethereal europa everything everything_thought evolution excessive existence extreme fakes feeling fifteen first firstborn flowers flux forever forever_and_a_day friends frog fuckeroonies ghost girl god god_writes_a_poem grains gravity gwar ha heaven here hey_god hypothesis i i_am_nothing icculus ideas idle ihateitwhenpeoplepreach imagination inconceivability inconceivable infinite inflection inside internet jared jesus jon joyce karma kennedy king knot knowledge lennon life light lisa love lyrics made mathnoise me memory messy metaphysics microscopic molly mollycule movement music needs nevermind nightmares nin not_e nothing nothing_is_everything nutopia om on_stuff_that_sucks out_of pale_beautiful papercup parliament_funkadelic perfect pi pisces place planck_length planet poetry power process productivity promise putty quietly quintessensual racehorse reason reawaken religion remote rhombohedron rhythm same satan schleiffen_plan self self_construct self_reliance shit shrooms sight silentbob_freewrite solid_very_solid soliloquy spark story taste techno the the_bed the_meaning_of_life the_roses the_theory_of_everything the_truth the_ultimate_secret_of_the_universe thinker thom's_teeth thoughts time true unrequited up vesuvius wad watching_the_water_flow weight windows wish word world worth www_internet you zorak zzxzy Is each of the above a STAR or a SHIT? It is best for U to contemplating it...
|
010112
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
...AND to keep U wandering in my MIND, my HEART, my BODY and my SOUL... day and night,..., again and again...
|
010112
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
And eureka, I found the first Theorem of the_theory_of_everything (TOE) associated with U (i.e. The Universe). Theorem 1: In U, STAR must coexist with SHIT; and vice versa. Proof: Without STAR, there is no SHIT. And without SHIT, there is no STAR. Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010113
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
*Corollary of Theorem 1 Corollary 1.1 In U, if You are STAR, then Someone or Something Must be SHIT(s); and if You are SHIT, then Someone or Something Must be STAR(s). Proof: Obviously, from Theorem 1. Corollary 1.2 In U, if You are STAR, then You must live with SHIT(s); and if You are SHIT, then You must live with STAR(s). Proof: "Live with" is more precise and specific than "Coexist". Test Question 1.1/ TQ1.1 Can someone or something be both STAR and SHIT? TQ1.2/ Conjecture 1 Everything or Everybody are both STAR and SHIT. TQ1.3 Is GOD a STAR? TQ1.4 What is the probability that GOD can be SHIT? Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010113
|
|
... |
|
|
god
|
damn. i am with you on this one totally. i am a shit.
|
010113
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
*The Universe and GOD Oh GOD,,, how is it possible for you to fail the TOE's test??? Some Hints or Tips might useful to get closer to the answer of above TQs:_ Given that The inconceivability of the creator of U or GOD, in Layman's term, is more and must be more than U, i.e. the UNIVERSE. And thus , the TQs associated with GOD and U is much more trickier than U... TQ1.3: Is GOD a Member of U? Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010113
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
TQ1.3: Is GOD a Member of U? should be read as TQ1.5: Is GOD (the Layman's terms for the Creator of the Universe) a Member of U? Answer for TQ1.1 to TQ1.5:- The Universal or Generic Answer, in order not to depress or create SHIT on someone, in particular, GOD:- The Answer is totally dependent on your STATE of MIND, at any sigle moment... *** The Virgin of Life It took me, probably more than 15 billions years to draw the following conclusion on secret or mystery of the Virgin of Life in the UNIVERSE, U:- Theorem 2: the_virgin_of_life the_Virgin_of_Life in U is the function of the Gene of Nothing and the Power of Creativity of U's STAR(s) / SHIT(s). Or in Mathematical form, VirginL = f ( GeneN, PowerC). Proof: The Creator of the Universe created the U with its Limitness Power of Creativity and NOTHING. NOTHING before the U is created is as to the Gene of Nothing of all STARs and SHITs in U; and GOD's Limitness Power of Creativity before the U is created is as to the Power of Creativity of all all STARs and SHITs in U. At the first moment when U was created:- The Universe, U is euqal to the Gene of Nothing of all STARs and SHITs in U and the Power of Creativity of all STARs and SHITs in U. And once upon a time, the_virgin_of_life emerges, and exists in U. Thus, it implied and concluded that VirginL = f ( GeneN, PowerC). And the beauty of this equation, is probably as good as, if not more than any best equation(s), such as E=mC**2 from Einstein, Albert, a German-born U.S. physicist, who created the theory of general relativity and special relativity and won a Nobel Prize in 1921 , ever found in the EARTH, or may be U. Note: Theory of General Relativity and Special Relativity are based on some Assumptions, which are still subject to validation over time. Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010117
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
TQ 2.1 What is the assumption for Theorem 2 on the Virgin of LIFE? TQ 2.2 Can LIFE survive and evolve without The POWER of CREATIVITY? TQ 2.3 / CONJECTURE: CHICKEN & EGG Relationship CHICKEN is not evolved from EGG; and vice versa. Anyone, in Particular GOD want to verify or prove this?
|
010118
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
TQ 2.4 What is the probable GENE of NOTHING in the context of COMPUTER? Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010118
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
To rephrase TQ 2.4 as:- TQ 2.4 What is the probable or the Closest GENE of NOTHING in the context of COMPUTER?
|
010118
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
O ?
|
010119
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
0 ?
|
010119
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
i.e. ZERO ?
|
010119
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
OOps.. Eureka... Something which can create or Produce ZERO !!! Something hidden in the chips of Computer (ATOM ? ), in the Computer's POWER Sources e.g. Electricity's ELECTRON, PROTON , ... Probably much smaller than ATOM, ELECTRON, PROTON, ... and the seach for THE_GENE_OF_NOTHING continue...
|
010119
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
TQ 2.5 What is the possible relationship(s) between GeneN and PowerC? TQ 2.6 What is the common attribute(s) of GeneN and PowerC?
|
010125
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
For further information about PowerC & GEneN, plese refer to The_Power_of_Creativity and The_Gene_of_NOTHING.
|
010206
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
***The MOTHER of All THEORY, M_Theory Given that LIFE in the UNIVERSE, U is a * Concerto of SHITs and STARs, ** where Success in Life is a beautiful melody from SHIT to STAR and Failure in Life is a bitter tune from STAR to SHIT; * Chain of SURPRISES; ** Yesterday’s chaos / problem / mistake, Today's reasoning / actions / resolutions, and Tomorrow's uncertainties / consequence(s) / and dreams...; * Symphony of STRINGS, ** Yesterday, today and tomorrow; and * Superstrings of U, ** its past, present & future..… What is the connection between LIFE and M_Theory, in Particular, The_THEORY_of_EVERYTHING? It took me much effort to contemplate, with the_Power_of_Creativity. And Eureka... I found the SECRET of M_Theory, the MOTHER of all THEORY: - Theorem 3: The Mother of all Theory The Mother of all Theory is the Function of LIFE. Or in Mathematical form, M_Theory = f ( LIFE ). Proof: Each Theory is a specific description of / about U's LIFE, from NOTHING, Something, Anything to EVERYTHING and it is also a product or byproduct of U. And thus, M_Theory is the function of LIFE of U, in particular, U's STARs / SHITs. TQ3.1 Is is true that every THEORY is either a SHIT or a STAR in U? Hint: e.g. The Earth is the Center of U, E=mC**2 from Einstein, etc... TQ 3.2 What is the relationship between MOTHER and VIRGIN? TQ3.3/ Conjecture: Virgin of all Theory The Virgin of all Theory is the function of LIFE. Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010206
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
A general Theory, Belief, Answer of " TQ 3.2 What is the relationship between MOTHER and VIRGIN? ", and probably the most touching story or more precisely, the greatest LOVE or Contribution in U:- *** MOTHER sacrifies or uses its ONE and only ONE's VIRGIN for the sake of New VIRGIN(s) of LIFE... *** However, any Theory in U is not PERFECT as there are always some surprises or exceptions; and this is probably a MOTHER NATURE of U... Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010206
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
As VIRGIN is Qualitative, instead of Quantitative, the most touching story or more precisely, the greatest LOVE or Contribution to U from MOTHER, is best to rephrase as follows:- *** The Pretty and Poor MOTHER sacrifices her VIRGIN for the sake of New VIRGIN of LIFE... ***
|
010207
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
TQ3.4 Who is the MOTHER of all THOUGHTs? TQ3.5 Who is the FATHER of all THOUGHTS? Copyright 2001. kx21.com
|
010212
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
*** The Fate of the Universe, U * The Simpliest Theory in U * all Must Know The fate of U is one of the oldest questions and the most profound and complicated question of all. "Spice, Shock, Surprise, …" are typical words used to describe the possible outcomes, answers and further questions … How will the universe end? Boom, Bleak, or Burst… A Chill, a Crunch, or a Fizz… There are three possible destinies for U, Opinions given by Scientists or possibly BULLSHIT(s) from Scientists, a Layman's view who never ever trusted a single word from all Scientists: *First possible destiny – The Closed U and a Big Crunch There is enough matter lurking in galaxies, gravity will eventually bring the current cosmic expansion to a halt and then reverse it, triggering a cataclysmic Big Crunch, which is like the Big Bang show backwards, the billions of years from now --perhaps providing the seed or more precisely a new and special Singularity for another Big Bang. *Second possible destiny – The Flat U and a Super SHIT. The universe will continue to expand, but at an ever slowing rate until, infinitely far into the future. will expand forever. Matter will spread thinner and thinner. Galaxies will exhaust their gas supply for forming new stars, and old stars will eventually burn out, leaving only dust and dead stars, or more precisely, Shits. The universe will become quite dark and, as the temperature of the universe will approaches absolute zero, quite cold. The universe will not end, exactly, just peter out in a Big Chill and ended up with a Super SHIT or DUST. *Third possible destiny - The Open U, and NOTHING with the Mysterious Force The expansion of the universe is being propelled by the Mysterious Force or Funny Energy and will continue at an accelerating pace forever. It will expand ever and even faster, the space between galaxies growing ever greater until eventually there is nothing left to see in our part of the cosmos. It will be filled with nothing - nothing, that is, apart from the mysterious force. Change is the only constant of U…and perhaps it is also relevant and applicable to our Talented and Renowned Scientists, in their search and theories of the Fate of U…. "This is a unique signature of a cosmological constant--namely that today the universe is accelerating, yesterday it was decelerating…” “A completely independent line of evidence also leads to a runaway universe and a mysterious form of energy.” “A theory known as quintessence suggests that the cosmological constant is not a constant at all but varies over time. In this model, cosmic expansion would not have sped up as rapidly. The recent observations of exploded stars, and latest theory now point to the third possibility. That is, The universe's rate of expansion is in fact increasing. Over the past year, new data appear to corroborate those findings. New observations of the cosmic microwave background suggest that the universe will expand forever at an accelerating rate. Scientific opinion has moved towards a flat Universe and the latest data confirm this with greater certainty than ever before. But even if the Universe lives forever, its inhabitants will not be so lucky. A mere thousand billion years from now, all the stars will have used up their fuel and fizzled out. All the black holes will evaporat | |