|
|
structure
|
|
miniver
|
The structure of linguistics is just a continuation of the same proposed argument, though. Right. Yes. I'm not arguing that we SHOULD BE more structured in our thinking -- I'm arguing that we ALREADY ARE. Even in our most seemingly spur-of-the-moment, wildly creative, spontaneously combustive thoughts. And even in our most stupid, unthought-out thoughts. That's what I'm arguing. I'm not quite sure why or with whom/what I am arguing, but I do appear to be arguing...
|
000830
|
|
... |
|
splinken
|
keep going, keep going!
|
000830
|
|
... |
|
miniver
|
Ad infinitum! Ad nauseum, even! Whichever comes first. And, of course, I will interpret lack of opposition as official acknowledgement of my Absolute and Most Indubitable Correctness.
|
000830
|
|
... |
|
sam
|
what? i need it why? because without it we're scratching our nails helplessly on the floor. would? i need anything to give my life meaning? really does it matter no. we used to walk together, for no reason, maybe, in the sun and always watching the cracks in the pavement (i used to wish my mother broken, she said to me) i wonder if that could have been the same sun? but structure: it's an illusion, it's just that...we all pretend it's real enough, so it looks real. looks real fucked-up.
|
010607
|
|
... |
|
oldephebe
|
from the days of yore.. well ok not yore but at least recent blather history...i recall posting to a page similar to this several weeks back-i guess we're all making the same arguments over and over again
|
030820
|
|
... |
|
n/t
|
n/t
|
040121
|
|
... |
|
xyz
|
it changes too much to ever be broken.
|
040122
|
|
... |
|
hsgatincamail
|
design
|
040701
|
|
... |
|
three words
|
structure soul_to_keep heaviness
|
050222
|
|
|
what's it to you?
who
go
|
blather
from
|
|