|
|
science_needs_to_get_laid
|
|
h|s|g
|
as_i_understand_it
|
101215
|
|
... |
|
epitome of incomprehensibility
|
If so, should it then have sex with another discipline/concept? Religion's busy, Art's recovering from a difficult relationship, but I hear Social Studies is single these days.
|
101215
|
|
... |
|
h|s|g
|
Physics? Or perhaps they could study physiology. then_again foreign language's kinda hot!
|
101215
|
|
... |
|
e_o_i
|
I've got to agree on the last one, but then I've got a personal bias. :)
|
101215
|
|
... |
|
science
|
I gotta have Phys Ed or I'm going trigonometric.
|
101215
|
|
... |
|
Cant stop laughing
|
and get some newtonian on their ass. .
|
101215
|
|
... |
|
unhinged
|
music is the perfect thing for science to fuck; it's got just enough physics and math involved to make science want it and music has a lot of soul music could definitely dislodge the stick from science's ass is totally biased
|
101216
|
|
... |
|
re_alisma
|
i think you're all a little uninformed. my grad school project knew how to get laid in a really prodigious way. i almost think that time-space continuums have merged because of it. and that the aliens will soon go home. science sex is hotter (much too hot is the problem) and much less "in your eyes"-y is all. it's secretive, that science. i guess what i'm trying to say here is that science, in practice, is a very passionate thing. of course these things are not physical. but neither is science! experiments are physical, and are very unsexy, yes, but science itself lies on the mental-emotional, where sex can happen. not an analogy, but can start making more analogies.... (you're not going to believe me when i say my grad school project REALLY got laid, but if you're sometime in heaven addicted to multidimensional blather i invite you to cue up the story. ! )
|
101216
|
|
... |
|
re_alisma
|
actually, "in your eyes" might be an accurate way to describe science. i used that for the wrong reason.
|
101216
|
|
... |
|
re_alisma
|
i actually think i'm pretty open to creative exploration of these things, and even egg them on myself, but i thought the characterization of science was very wrong, in this instance. i'm sorry if i ruined the fun, but it was just too haughty for me. (although science can also be very haughty so maybe that science deserved it.)
|
101216
|
|
... |
|
unhinged
|
yeah, science tends to think it's the only one with any power and completely dismisses the validity of other truths because the parameters or so narrow. right or wrong. empirical or nonexistent. science needs to chill out and accept that there are some parts of reality that may be immeasurable.
|
101216
|
|
... |
|
science
|
If I can't measure it I can't fuck with it.
|
101217
|
|
... |
|
no reason
|
if science realized that it would become art
|
101217
|
|
... |
|
ergo
|
Well science, since you're such a big tool, maybe you should try auto mechanics.
|
101217
|
|
... |
|
science
|
I said laid, not jacked off. Ergo, shut up!
|
101217
|
|
... |
|
h|s|g
|
talk_nerdy_to_me
|
101219
|
|
... |
|
e_o_i
|
It's hard to define the character of science, because science is very big. (Not in "that way"... but maybe...)
|
101230
|
|
... |
|
h|s|g
|
character_of_signs
|
101230
|
|
... |
|
h|s|g
|
blue_you_blow_mynd
|
101230
|
|
... |
|
science
|
Yes eoi, in that way.
|
101231
|
|
... |
|
science
|
You may think me bragging, but you don't have any idea of how hard it is to be a sex symbol.I know that when anybody thinks of science they think about getting it on, but I'm so tired of being a fiction, a fantasy! When will I be loved for what I truly am.
|
110101
|
|
|
what's it to you?
who
go
|
blather
from
|