nothing_lasts_forever
sab
and_im_all_good_with_that 		040708
...
Why not ? Given 040708
...
:) We_are_the_Universe... 040708
...
a "Point" 'Both mice and men shared a common ancestor, a creature about the size of a small rat, that lived during the time of the dinosaurs between 75 and 125 million years ago. 040708
...
Doar no wear and tear on "nothing". it's the miracle product you've been waiting for. 040708
...
daxle even cold november rain 040708
...
puredream dare me to dream 040708
...
lacunas coil you dream,
but they don't even last

sometimes they become reality
or so you think
when you remember them 		040709
...
love & hate except my love for you Katie... 040709
...
misstree a little while is good enough for me. 040709
...
daxle and we both know things can change 040715
...
dosquatch I love that song, daxle. 040716
...
Afro and we both know hearts can change. 040819
...
love & hate nothing lasts forever and forever never lasts... 040819
...
pete windows will always crash 040819
...
Laughter in the cattle prod Is that a constant state of M_Theory in Apples & Oranges? 040819
...
uow at least nothing does 040819
...
Borealis not even death.
I am resurrecting an old self.
this is less a proclamation so much as self-motivation to begin again.. 		041106
...
unhinged everytime you leave
i worry if it's the last time 		100117
...
Analyst This statement is inherently false. It is impossible for this statement to carry any meaningful truth-value. To say that "nothing lasts forever" is merely the utterance of a platitude. 100118
...
. This is a statement of the basic impermenance of 'stuff'. To demonstrate this as inherently false, you must provide evidence of the counter - that is, show some person, thing, or concept, that remains completely unchanged for the entire duration of existence. 100118
...
Analyst Now you are interpreting. I was not critiquing an interpretation you had not even yet offered. I was responding solely to the phrase "nothing lasts forever" and I stand by my original post. It is a platitude and nothing more. 100118
...
. It is true that this is a platitude. It does not logically follow that the statement must therefore be inherently false. You are drawing a false conclusion. 100118
...
Analyst I never said it was false based upon it being a platitude. I said it was false. Then I said it was a platitude. So 'tis thee whom hath concluded falsely. 100118
...
. Then your assertion that it is a platitude, while true, serves no purpose here. The meat of your response, "I stand by my original post, it is a platitude and nothing more," tends to indicate that this is important to your reasons for holding the statement false. I drew my conclusion based on the implications of the language used.

You assert that it is inherently false. I counter on face that it is a statement of impermenance. You assert it has no meaningful truth-value.

All truth has meaning. Truth is the path to enlightenment. To deny basic truth, even when not profound, is to lose the path. 		100119
...
minnesota_chris this is an obvious statement, so obvious to be unneccessary, but only to a few.

The rest of us, however, look at the things that are, and think that they always have been, and always will be.

Me, whenever I get sick, I think I'll die soon. I always get better of course, but still. 		100119
...
z define: "no" "thing" "last" and "forever". then argue based on the agreed definition. i agree with this statement based on my definitions of the above words. 100119
...
somebody Be advised that "nothing" is not the same as "no_thing", this blathe employing the former. 100119
...
Pillarsurfer Merely_words!!! 100119
...
deb This is the working title
of a book I started
10-ish years ago 		100119
...
??? How about nothing_lasting_forever itself? Does that not last forever either? 100119
...
??? How much time remains on two plus two equaling four? 100119
...
hsg does nothing_last_forever, last_forever?

that's_the_thing
&
this_too_shall_pass

but i have to wonder will_solomon_pass ? 		100120
...
minnesota_chris no underwear last forever 100120
...
unhinged impermanence 100122
...
fussicus maximus transformation is not synonymous with elimination, so why do we equate change with impermanence? what was will always have been; so what seems to no longer remain is yet a permanent facet of what has existed. "the danger is in the neatness of identification." 100122
what's it to you?
who go 		blather
from