|
|
us_attacks_kx21_1
|
|
kx21
|
M_evolution_21 of us_attacks_kx21...
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
.
|
kx21 must die coalitionkx21 must die coalition KX21, You are spamming us. You know it, we know it. We are not going to let it go anymore. Quit now. 040607 ...
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kx21
|
iLink:- is_someone_deleting_the_political_pages
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kookaburra
|
hey kx. will you talk to me? pleeze? we could talk about anything. really. you pick the topic. just you aren't a computer.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kookaburra
|
just prove you aren't a computer. pleeze!!
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
:)
|
It's just a M string...
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
.
|
http://www.kx21.com/
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
dosquatch
|
Can you give a straight answer?
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
:)
|
Its iLink:- kookaburra_chats_with_kx21
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kookaburra
|
can you give a one word answer?
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kx21
|
Win_the_battle_'but'_lose_the_war_1 kx21 M_Evolution_21 of Win_the_battle_'but'_lose_the_war 040607
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kookaburra
|
hey wait. you used to speak normally. what happened?
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kx21
|
* Parallel_sayings * Win_the_battle_'but'_lose_the_war_1 = Win_the_battle_'but'_lose_the_war in the blather space... Is that the final_answer?
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
.
|
iLink:- is_someone_deleting_the_political_pages
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
kx21
|
us_'sincere_apology'_prior_to_its_cut_and_run Why_NOT?
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
skinny
|
i think kx21 is kinda cool
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
cloudy with a chance of meatballs
|
cool. im not the only one? thats awesome. but as of yet, neither of us has the capacity to undelete pages. we're a very small army it seems.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
dosquatch
|
For what it's worth, nothing "coalition" has done so far has actually deleted anything, just obfuscated it. I think everything could be brought back, at least that's how it looks to me. You might want a second opinion from a blather_god.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
endless desire
|
endless_desire_attacks_kx21
|
040608
|
|
... |
|
dudeinanigloo
|
There is a subject/verb disagreement in this name. If "us" is referring to a group of individuals describing themselves, the pronoun "we" would be used instead. And the conjunction of the verb "to attack" would have to be changed according to the pronoun it is assigned to. In this case, "we attack" would be used instead. Or, if "us" is a singular noun, the verb would be conjugated respectively. However, "USA" means "United States of America," which is not a singular noun group. However, the states are not referred to when describing the nouns. Rather, the states are said to be in a group called a country, "America," which is a singular noun. Therefore, after careful scrutinizing, it can be inferred that this blathe's name does in fact make sense. Let's see kx_21 respond to that. (hehehehehehe...)
|
040708
|
|
... |
|
kx21
|
* Parallel_sayings * The images of USA = US = United_States = The_images_of_americans...
|
040708
|
|
... |
|
nonlucid
|
ouch, that was hard to swallow Grammar's so indigestable
|
040708
|
|
... |
|
:)
|
a_phrase_is_worth_1000000_'pictures'?
|
040709
|
|
... |
|
.
|
"We can make them (Americans) use their rifles against us or we can make them build our country, it's your choice,"
|
040709
|
|
|
what's it to you?
who
go
|
blather
from
|