interdisciplinary_studies epitome of incomprehensibility Bridging the gap between science and religion: If NaCl loses its NaCl-ness, how can it be made NaCl-y again? What about film and biology? I had to slice open a dog's eyeball. Of course, it was an Andulasian dog. (Un Chien Andalou.) Math and philosophy. In class today, we added up all our thoughts on existence, plotted them on a Cartesian graph, and came up with a cogito ergo sum. 061025 ... Christ without the cross What are your views on God? I am very interested to know 061026 ... e_o_i I actually had three paragraphs written down, not all about God, incidentally, but the new blather system probably thought I was taking too long. (20 minutes? I dunno) I'll have to get back to you some other time. 061027 ... e_o_i Oh, hello. Now that I'm here again and I don't have massive amounts of school projects and stuff and given that I saw you (CWTC) on blather recently... yah. Let me say that I am inclined to favour the existence of God because it seems like a plausible explanation for eveything. A typical creationist would say: was the Taj Mahal (or any other great building/work of art) built by itself? Their rhetoric. (Personally, I'm not convinced of the 6000-year time frame they put on the universe, though. I went to a school that taught that kind of stuff and I am rather sick of it. Give science some credit!) Anyway. I will also admit that, as a finite human being, I do not have all the answers and I am not Absolutely Sure. And how dare you write serious stuff in a funny-or-trying-to-be-so blathe ? Just joking. How dare I have the rudeness to answer so late. A mote of dust in my neighbour's eye and a log in my own. 061217 ... e_o_i again Hmmm. Interesting. The word "creationist" hasn't been blathed on yet. Neither has the canadian spelling of "neighbour". 061217 what's it to you? who go blather from