|
|
freedom_of_speech
|
|
u24
|
almost every government in the world censors news, to some degree. While some censorship is overt, most occurs covertly, usually via the owners of large media corporations having vested interests in the government they report on.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
|
thankfully, censorship hasn't yet permeated the reaches of cyberspace. That is to say, websites themselve are usually relatively unrestricted in terms of what is acceptable content. Even if a piece of content is said to breach the acceptable use policy, there are plenty of other websites that will happily host such content. On the other hand, it is important to note that some governments have circumvented this freedom of expression on the internet by instead simply blocking access to websites containing what they deem as objectionable terms.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
i stole
|
the concept from uncyclopedia
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
|
.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
somewhat ironically, the more there is on blather, the more will be removed from this page. almost self-censoring.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
zeke
|
i am very impressed by this design.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
why thankyou, but as i said the credit should go to the uncyclopedia
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
unfortunately, not all censorship is so easily circumvented
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
it fact it's quite enlightening to see blather so mercilessly chopped up like this. our words are there, but not visible. it's also unfortunate that not all forms of censorship are this easily spotted. in most cases, i would think, there are no handy black bars to show that what you're reading is not the original.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
see also freedom_of_speech2 for a less obvious method. for number 2 originally, I'd wanted non-links to have black bars, but it seem CSS is incapable. I wanted to see what perceptual difference there was between majority censored and minority censored.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
just a minor tweak.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
i like the way random nonsensical sentences are constructed from the censored words. Or perhaps not entirely nonsensical, they seem to reflect the original, but in a twisted-beyond-recognition way.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
a final adjustment to make the illusion complete.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
oops. not quite final.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
tbh, I'm amazed that freedom_of_speech hadn't been made a blathe before now.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
u24
|
ok, I'm really done now.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
unreal
|
Won too three for five sicks seven ate nein tin.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
zeke
|
i am redacted.
|
060324
|
|
... |
|
zeke
|
in this blathe the dynamic nature of the words which become hotlinks will cause more and more words to be redacted as time passes. i like that very much.
|
060407
|
|
... |
|
Soren Kierkegaard
|
"People demand freedom_of_speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." (1813 - 1855)
|
070707
|
|
... |
|
somebody
|
I use both. Consequently, some would censor me. It is in everyone's interest to thwart the censors 99.999% of the time. Only in the rarest instances is this not so, no?
|
070708
|
|
... |
|
forsaken by a toaster
|
clerbloinkula!! ahahaha!!!!!
|
070708
|
|
... |
|
z
|
is all we ever had. celebrate it with all of the enthusiasm you can muster.
|
091204
|
|
... |
|
hsg
|
_press _ctrl _+ _a _control_all _freedom_of_speech
|
091204
|
|
... |
|
hsg
|
_in _graphology, _the _underscorelike _preparatory _stroke _indicates _obedience. _in _this _blathe _i _obey _this _so _my _words _are _freely _read. _* _on _a _sidenote _some _private _schools _insist _on _this _manner _of _cursive.
|
091204
|
|
... |
|
ergo
|
Witch freedom do you do you speak of?
|
091205
|
|
... |
|
ergo
|
_Oh_
|
091205
|
|
... |
|
oren
|
Neato! I_wanna be censored too!
|
100814
|
|
... |
|
DONALD TRUMP
|
SAY_WHATEVER
|
160516
|
|
|
what's it to you?
who
go
|
blather
from
|