|
|
brain's_axons_are_extremely_sensitive_to_direction
|
|
|
mp21k
|
Brain's Axons Are Extremely Sensitive To Directional Cues
2004-05-26
New Technology Shows Washington, D.C. – Researchers at Georgetown University have developed a novel technology to precisely measure the sensitivity of nerve fibers that wire up the brain during development. Through use of this technology, they discovered that these fibers, or axons, possess an incredible sensitivity to molecular guidance cues that direct the axon's route to its desired destination in the brain. Their findings are described in the June issue of Nature Neuroscience.
Similar to connecting your PC, monitor, mouse and printer correctly to make all computer parts work, the developing brain needs a series of critical wiring connections to be made for it to function properly. But, unlike computers that come with a user and troubleshooting manual, nerve fibers called axons must follow molecular cues to find the right targets.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/05/040524060425.htm
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
methinx
|
You never learned to count to 50 as a child, did you?
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
0^0
|
The "Flaw" of Blather software...
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
methinx
|
Some would consider failure to adapt a "flaw".
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
:)
|
What's_the_Point:-
That "flaw' is "best" to leave it for Computer to fix, instead for human to "count"...
Show one why_not...
And_I_will_tell_you_how_wonder_you_are...
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
methinx
|
The computer does not fix the problems, it leaves all files corrupt until fixed by man.
You claim it more efficient to creat two corrupt blathes before you get the count within limitations then to count the charactors once? Does that not tripple your effort needed to create the blathe, and create usless information on blather: corrupted files?
Wouldn't it be better to not keep repeating your mistakes? Wouldn't it be more efficient to have your first blathe readable?
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
:)
|
PCA: Refer to it's_over...
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
What's_the_Point:-
Nothing is Perfect?
(e.g. Blather Spaces)...
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
methinx
|
The system is perfect. You, the user, supply the imperfections through refusing to understand the rules of the game.
Your failure to adapt has stunted your progresion.
You WILL, ultimately, trim your blathe title to an accepted lenght. I do not understand why you insist on doing this the hard way however.
Perhaps you will explain?
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
M Hint: Ask Bill Gates-
Name any Software (From Microsoft or Rest of Mocrosoft) which is Really (i.e. 100%) "Perfect"...
http://www.microsoft.com/billgates/default.asp
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
***
* M_theory: Software & Human
***
That "perfect" software does not exist in the Human_spaces, with proof...
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
?
|
Scientific evidence:
Typo- Mocrosoft
Name any Software (From Microsoft or Rest of Mocrosoft) which is Really (i.e. 100%) "Perfect"...
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
methinx
|
Failure in logic: Bill Gates did not invent Blather.
Software without user is nothing. Nothing is perfect. Therefor: Software is perfect, user is flawed.
|
040606
|
|
... |
|
|
.
|
...
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
|
|
.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
|
|
.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
|
|
.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
|
|
.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
|
|
.
|
040607
|
|
... |
|
|
|
