interrupted_conversations Mahayana discussions are just needlessly oblique comprised of unfinished sentences and interrupted conversations i realize you had many ideas you wanted to share and you were very enthusiastic 0r that perhaps you had grown tired of my communicating, however I wanted to bring to your attention that by interrupting someone in that way, that person will be less open to hearing your ideas no matter how good or inagreement they may be and i want to hear your ideas, i only wish that no matter how tired you have grown of my words that youd have the respect for me to listen, you said you agreed with me in mid thought of my communication, should i just automatically cease talking to you b/c you agree with what i said, no for when i communicate with you it is not to recruit you towards my mode of thinking but to express myself to you as a thinking, loving, human being with wonderings and views to share i heard you when you said that what you wanted from me was to acknowledge that i read your agreement, and i was going to do just that, however I was in mid thought and wanted to complete my sentence before recognizing your own words to me, i only typed three tiny sentences before you lost patience with me, from the time you agreed to the time you lost patience and interrupted me was not suffcient [that tether is a leash. and it is not clear which end is connected to the accused interrupter and which to the interrupted accused non-listener.] 030825 what's it to you? who go blather from