|
|
but_andru235_time_is_moving_along_a_2d_line
|
|
andru235
|
oh, it is? i hadn't noticed. thanks for pointing that out. i'll use an old, old analogy that someone recently took credit for: i step forward, and there i stay. i move left, and there i stay. i jump up, but do not stay - i am pulled back to the ground! "that's gravity in the third dimension, you fool" thanks for the love, and for missing the entire point of that analogy. the fact that i can move freely across area but cannot expand my motion in volume is perhaps analogous to time; we can move only forward, but not back, and when people fantasize about time-travel it never seems to dawn on them to move laterally. "i still think it is binary. how do you plan to make the three into five?" well, if you still refuse to see the trinarity, you aren't going to see quintility if i hit you with it in the shoulder. but, fool that i am, i'll blather on. if one somehow, through divinely binary graces, to see the trinarity of past, present and future, we can add two related but distinctly different states: transtemporality (that which 'simultaneously' spans past present and future) and atemporality (that which exists outside of time) "i think that's dumb" think what you will. it is my hope that you do just that. you will what you think and that is what you see.
|
050418
|
|
|
what's it to you?
who
go
|
blather
from
|
|