teats Q I prefer teats too. Or breasts. It is not an issue of size, but one of usage. Literary usage. 001001 ... grendel on he literary note, i guess i'm more partial to "breasts" or maybe eve "bosoms" "teats" seems too much like a purely biological term (and too animal at that) and "tits" does just seem too vulgar...but even that, in some context wouldn't necessarily be wrong 001001 ... jennifer amber says: "milk from the devil's teats" 001001 ... Q Not that I mind teats for "usage," other than literary usage, provided it is consenually and tenderly, very tenderly. This includes my own, by the way. Never would I consider, or consider referring in public or even intimate private to, a teat as a tit. As far as I've ever been concerned, no teat I've ever been treated to consider in its fleshy fulness has been a tit, regardless of its size or supposed lack thereof. 001001 ... Barrett Show Me Your Teats! 001002 ... god let's see some udders! 051105 what's it to you? who go blather from