e_o_i_reviews
epitome of incomprehensibility Reviewing. I feel an impulse to do so, in some form or other, when I see something artistic, especially something artistic that's narrative, like a concert or book or movie. Not so much a painting. I don't understand them. I do them, such as when I'm listening to music, but only with cheap materials and not the giant ceiling brush that Julie Binoche used in the movie Words_and_Pictures. (I do things, and I am trying to do things more purposefully, though I can't promise to do everything well. Jack of all trades is reviewer of She that can't do, teach not_quite_truisms.)

But some notes about concerts are still just in my journal or little green notepad, because when I write something in one place I often get too lazy to write about it in another place, even though I know revision helps concizify things.

Reviewing reminds me that I have pride, sometimes too much of it. I'll sometimes read book reviews on Amazon.com, and then think, I don't want to review a book there - why should I waste my time promoting their business? Maybe that kind of pride is OK. I haven't gotten anything of the reviewing sort officially published yet. It's more a thing I do that helps me remember stuff I experienced. And in a way it's not selfish, because you're focusing on someone else's work and trying to connect with it without placing yourself at the centre of attention.
140708
what's it to you?
who go
blather
from