|
|
the_kx21_law
|
|
|
x
|
This landmark case upholds the right of any blatherer/blatherskite to say whatever they want, however many times they want, at the cost of whoever.
|
040524
|
|
... |
|
|
phil
|
concept
|
040524
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
"Thermodynamics"
The Beast of FADE 123...
|
040524
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
Bill Gates: In 2014, magic software, free hardware
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/Gates_gives_magical_software_tour.html
|
040524
|
|
... |
|
|
?
|
This_is_an_artistic_area
|
040524
|
|
... |
|
|
dosquatch
|
Does that include attempts to coax something resembling normal discourse from the bot?
|
040524
|
|
... |
|
|
p2
|
this may be the_kx21_law
but in my heart
it will always be
the_chrity_principle
which states that
a person has the ability
to blathe anything they want
anywhere they want
without regard to relevance
or repetition
and you will have no power
to stop them
honorable mentions:
phil's "today" experiment
neal_boortz
|
040525
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
* iLink:- M_Physics_21 *
|
040525
|
|
... |
|
|
?
|
a2z_123
|
040525
|
|
... |
|
|
kx21
|
We_are_the_Universe...
|
040612
|
|
... |
|
|
:)
|
Amen.
|
040612
|
|
... |
|
|
One
|
OM...
|
040612
|
|
... |
|
|
daxle
|
you really took this the wrong way
|
040612
|
|
... |
|
|
smurfus rex
|
hehe
|
040612
|
|
... |
|
|
falling_alone
|
i dont get why we need the law...
arent you just stating the reason blather exists? i thought that we could do what we want was implied
|
040613
|
|
... |
|
|
three words
|
convincing the_kx21_law falls_apart
|
050510
|
|
... |
|
|
z
|
blather is like samuel r delaney's unlicenced sector in triton, and his flirtation with anarchic modes of being in dhalgren and other books. it is lawless.
with the exception of people tinkering with it's very structure, blather is a total free for all. that is why it is so inspiring to me. imagine if blathes were juried, redacted or censored. there are no rights in anarchy. there are no bounds. this is real freedom.
i simply ignore kx21 at this time. i ignore a lot of other material here also, but i am glad it is here. that does not mean that i do not respond critically when incited or provoked. that too is part of the experience, along with bad poetry, teenaged angst, and obsessiveness of all sorts.
we are all the perfect examples of someone's dislikes. we all share the certainty that at any time, somebody is scoffing at our work. does it stop you? and should it?
|
050511
|
|
... |
|
|
andru235
|
z: i couldn't agree more.
ok, i *could* agree more but i would only be doing so for the sheer pleasure of being extra agreeable.
that is, i agree, very strongly.
since my first posts i have known that eyes would roll and tsk's would be doubled. vocally i learned this early. so i assumed it was intrinsically blathic that some posts (of anyones) would be considered by some minds and avoided by others.
|
050511
|
|
... |
|
|
:)
|
...
|
061114
|
|
... |
|
|
()
|
()
|
061114
|
|
|
what's it to you?
who
go
|
blather
from
|
