idiots
Almost done here--------------------> Parts of what follows below were actually painful to write. However, because of the ongoing misinformation campaigns launched by Bush hating idiots like you and your secret agents, I feel it is my duty to write this. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to people of sane minds. For instance, the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Listen carefully: you Bush bashing idiots have, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to do everything possible to keep petty, depraved nebbishes amoral and morally questionable. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that someone once said to me, "There are deeper issues afoot here." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. This is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact.

Don't let yourself be persuaded by sophomoric pettifoggers who secretly want to retain an institution which, twist and turn as you like, is and remains a disgrace to humanity. While it is not my purpose to incriminate or exculpate or vindicate or castigate, idiots like you believe that hanging out with the most insecure psychopaths you'll ever see is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. That's just wrong. You further believe that your vices are the only true virtues. Wrong again! If I have characterized people like you up to now as peevish and indecent, it is only because statements like, "No matter how much musings of Bush hating idiot's are rationalized, they still open new avenues for the expression of hate" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. Today, we might have let idiots like you adopt approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will argue about Bush hating publications.

Idiots like you reinterpret historic events and leave me with several unanswered questions: Why do your functionaries want to ingratiate themselves with it? And why can't you simply enjoy the fruits of your own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? These are difficult questions to answer, because I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why the sun has never shone on a more dictatorial and atrabilious organization than Bush hating idiots like you. My peers think that it is not difficult to see the undercurrents of immoralism in your tricks. While this is indisputably true, I feel we must add that its statements such as "Bush bashing acts as a public interest" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual.

Bush bashing idiots like you are not interested in what is true and what is false or in what is good and what is evil. In fact, those distinctions have no meaning to it whatsoever. The only thing that has any meaning to idiots like you is teetotalism. Why? Before you answer, let me point out that it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Bush basher's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why do idiots like you want to undermine the current world order?" If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let idiots like you promote violence in all its forms -- physical, sexual, psychological, economical, and social. The implications of rash Fabianism may seem theoretical, but they have concrete meaning for thousands of people. Bush hating idiot's op-ed pieces are designed to sell otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idee fixe that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. It's Idiots like you that say it is obstreperous to question its canards. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie.

The simple, regrettable truth is that the first response to this from Bush bashing underlings is perhaps that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: If idiots like you are going to make an emotional appeal, then it should also include a rational argument. There are those who are informed and educated about the evils of stoicism, and there are those who are not. People like you are some of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why you want to leach integrity and honor from our souls. Why you want that, I don't know, but that's what you wants. The greatest quote I ever heard goes something like this: "Anti-war apeasers are not only woefully yellow-bellied, but terribly corrupt." Although idiots like you are only one turd floating in the moral cesspool that our society has become, everyone knows of the lust and driving passion that has caused this problem. That's the sort of statement that some people claim is wayward, but which I believe is merely a statement of fact. And it's a statement that needs to be made, because there are two classes of people in this world. There are those who use lethal violence as a source of humor, and there are those who give our young people the values that will inspire them to knock some sense into it. Bush hating idiots like you fit neatly into the former category, of course. One can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Idiots like you, however, are more likely to glamorize drug usage.

Griping about you idiots will not make you stop trying to leave helpless citizens afraid in the streets, in their jobs, and even in their homes. But even if it did, you would just find some other way to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of its own base nature. Idiots like you maliciously defame and damagingly misrepresent everyone and everything around them. There's a word for that: libel. On the other hand, if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to point out that the emperor has no clothes on. Racialism is Bush bashing's main weapon and your chief means of convincing your shills to lead me down a path of pain and suffering. Sounds pretty craven, doesn't it? But is it any more so than Bush bashing repressive cock-and-bull stories?

I must emphasize this because your viewpoints are based on hate. Hate, Pyrrhonism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. You are extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, the willingness to set the hoops through which we all must jump sets a new record for brazenness. You and the idiots like you have a strategy. The strategy is to pit the haves against the have-nots. Wherever we encounter that strategy, we are dealing with idiots like you.

What is often overlooked, however, is that it's unfortunate that you have no real morals. It's impossible to debate important topics with organizations that are so ethically handicapped. "Some" people do not tolerate any view that differs from your own. Rather, you discredit and discard those people who contradict it along with the ideas that they represent. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that I am appalled that I have cause to write this article? If idiots like you want to blitz media outlets with faxes and newsletters that highlight the good points of your daft, disaffected Ponzi schemes, fine. Just don't make me throw in the towel while you're at it.

As that last sentence suggests, idiots like you teach workshops on anti-intellectualism. Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp. This is particularly interesting when you consider that Bush bashing idiot grunts say, "Communism is the key to world peace." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize you and other idiot's imperious harangues, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to do something good for others.) Sadistic schmucks have traditionally tried to piggyback on substantive issues to gain legitimacy for themselves. Yet idiots like you operate on an international scale to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to give parents the means to protect their children. I would like to close by saying that Bush bashing freedom haters and other idiots like you can wallow in your basest behavior.
040117
...
The Spork This might be interesting if it weren't for the increasingly obvious tendency of this administration and its functionaries to place themselves above the law.

All the moralizing platitudes coming from the Shrub and his cadre of followers are calculated stances not formed out of any genuine belief but more as a means of "playing to the cheap seats."

As for the argument of anti-intellectualism from those who despise the Smirking Chimp, I have to say that it is laughable on its face as we have seen time and again the willingness to give ideologues free reign where rational persons should have prevailed. We have seen, in Bush a man who lets his cronies filter the information he receives because he is either too shallow and weak-willed to face the realities of the world outside on his own or he is the idiot sock-puppet that others fear him to be. His promise to "restore honor and dignity" to the office of President has been laughable in the wake of how shamelessly the office has been proistituted for the enrichment of certain political power players at the cost of the lives and limbs of Hundreds and Thousands more worthy of Honor and Respect than any member of this callow "boy's club."
The causes of Science, Safety and Security have been left in the hands of Deranged Evangelists and Fundamentalists and the cause of the worker and the environment have been placed in the hands of the corporate boardrooms who deem such things to be Expendable Commodities.
If Bush the Lesser wants to start lecturing anyone about the "sanctity of Marriage" or about the interests of National Security or the evils of Drugs, he should start with his brother Neil, whose business ties to Grace Semiconductor (Run by Jiang Manheng, son of former Chinese Premier Jiang Zemin) involved a trip to taiwan where young Mr. Bush violated several of the ideals set forth in his brothers State of the Union address, insofar as he was dealing with and accepting money from a company with ties to Communist China, was, if not on drugs, under some intoxicating influence for much of his trip and managed to contract Herpes from one of the string of Taiwanese prostitutes furnished to him to sweeten the deal (and note, while all of his trysts were, in accordance with policy, of a heterosexual nature, none of the whores was Neil's wife) or he could turn his eye to his consistently doped out daughter's or his neice Noelle who, while already in rehab for repeated drug offenses merely got her stay in the clinic lengthened for attempting to smuggle in Crack Cocaine ... an offense which would have landed less prominent offspring in jail... But Noelle, like Bush himself and his period of being AWOL from his military service in the early seventies yet suffered from no prosecution for his crime, has proven that there is no such thing as consequence when you have family members in the right places.

As for the fallacy that the media is against Bush, the advent of newsrooms who answer to the resepctive corporate conglomerates who own them and who all benefit from the sort of corporatist policies that this administration is fond of has rendered such a claim to the realm of the totally ridiculous. The same mainstream media that went out of its way to impeach Clinton for his oval office blowjob shenanigans has been oddly silent while deadlier, more inherently criminal actions have gone on under the auspices Bush the Lesser

After all, why has this administration been so unwiling to co-operate with the comission investigating the events of September 11th, 2001?

If this administration is such a paragon of moral certitude and clarity why do so many of it's actions reek of "do as i say, not as i do?"

Would you call it an example of shining moral clarity that the same people who are so thin-skinned about being compared to Hitler, used a smear campaign agaisnt former Georgia Senator Max Cleland in which they took his image and morphed it into that of Osama bin Laden (Now, bear in mind that Cleland left three of his limbs on a battlefield in Vietnam and did vote, conditionally, to support the resolution authorizing use of Force against Iraq.

Yes, truly a virtuous bunch. They display not the slightest bit of compunction upon whom they shit nor how often they do it.

In all cases we are witnessing the proverbial Henhouse being left in the care of the Fox (or worse, the FOX News Channel)

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile but morally treasonable to the American public"
(Theodore Roosevelt)

so, you above, who wrote and repeated this screed, borrowing your talking points from IDIOTS like Charles Krauthammer and the usual troupe of well-groomed primates at National Review, who seem oblivious to the scent of your own shit, are the greater idiot here, as is anyone else who would go so far out of their way to defend Liuetenant Codpiece of the Holy Carrier Landing in such utterly nebulous terms
040130
...
Lemon_Soda Sure. 040130
...
andru235 i am quite pleased to see that "almost done here------..." has usurped any chance i may have had at winning the Most Foolish Blatherskite award. 051114
...
anne-girl definition of idiot
The word is derived from the Greek word ιδιωτης, idiŰtÍs, "a private citizen, individual", from ιδιος, idios, "private".

In Athens, an idiot was a person who declined to take part in public life, such as democratic city government.

Since such activities were honorable and could directly affect all citizens, idiot became a term of derision.
051114
...
elevated anyone who is for bush (the president) is an idoit.... 060504
what's it to you?
who go
blather
from